Monarch of the Glen (2000 – 2005)

monarch-of-the-glen-dvd4 Kernels

 The Bankrupt Estate

Stars:  Alastair Mackenzie, Richard Briers, Susan Hampshire
Type:  TV Series – BBC Scotland

I’ve been streaming Monarch of the Glen for a few weeks now and have made my way through Season 4. There are a few more ahead of me, but I’ve peeked online and read what is to come. No surprises await me.

When Season 1 began, I was quickly drawn into the story and the lives of all the players with great interest. Archie, the reluctant Laird, played by cutie Alastair Mackenzie, is a keen personality drawn home to Glenbogle and a position he doesn’t care to hold. The family estate is bankrupt, his father is in denial of the problems, and his mother schemes to keep Archie there. Archie, however, is determined to make it a short visit and hopes to return to his overbearing girlfriend and entrepreneurship as a restaurant owner in London. The family estate contain painful memories of a brother who drowned in the loch.

As the story ensues, he is sucked back into the world of his childhood. His dead ancestors, along with his parents, are determined to make him face up to his responsibilities as the Laird of Glenbogle. Events lead to just that – he abandons his life in London and roots himself back into his heritage. His family and the staff are an eclectic mixture of personalities, as well as family friends and potential loves. Of some interest, one friend of the family and neighbor is played by Julian Fellowes, who later went on to write Downton Abbey.  The first three seasons I thoroughly enjoyed, but as the seasons continued on, I found myself losing interest.

Archie’s first love interest, Katrina, made a great angst-filled love story of two personalities clashing together, who were both too proud to admit their feelings. When they finally do, the actress who plays the part leaves the show, and we are left with Archie once again seeking to adjust.

Lexie, the cook and housemaid, has her eyes on Archie; but, of course, the class separation looms before her as an obstacle. Golly and Duncan are great side characters and employees of the estate.  Hector, Archie’s father, and Molly his mother, are wonderful characters in their own right. The story focuses upon their intent to get the estate out of debt before the bank forecloses and forces them to sell. As they struggle to get out of debt, life goes on with its ups and down, along with humorous and lighthearted episodes that continue to entertain. There are a few characters I grew to dislike, however, especially from the bank!

Unfortunately, I found the series losing steam toward the end. Huge changes in casting and story line occurred, and the blending of the characters you’ve come to love, suddenly unravel. People leave the show, replacements come in, and things change. I think, too, I wasn’t exactly overwhelmed over Archie’s choice of a love interest in Lexie at first. For so long there was no spark between the two, and then suddenly he confesses he’s loved her all along. The emotionless expression on his face gave me the impression he was settling rather than being head-over-heels in love, which is the story I would have preferred to see. I see in the episodes ahead, a little more emotion between the two, though.

In any event, it’s a good and entertaining watch. The Scottish history and heritage is fascinating. The scenery is absolutely breathtaking and makes me want to visit Scotland the next time I cross the pond. It was filmed on location in Scotland around Badenoch and Strathspey and at the Ardverikie House, on the far shore of Loch Laggan.

One other comment, if you’re not used to heavy Scottish brogue, the dialogue is sometimes difficult to understand.

The Forsyte Saga (2002-03)

4 Kernels

(2002-03) – Television Series – ITV
 Damian Lewis Actor

Since I’m in the midst of writing my own English saga of sorts, I usually get sucked into these DVD sets for hours on end drowning myself in period English dramas. The Forsyte Saga makes it to the top of my list as an enjoyable treat of English life.

I’m often fascinated over how the rich lived in the Victorian age. My English family made bricks, while families like these lived lives of luxury filled with all sorts of soap opera antics.

The Forsyte Saga is a television adaptation of John Galsworthy three novels, which apparently has been filmed in other adaptations throughout the years. This particular version was done by Granada Television for the ITV network, however, some complained it took too many liberties from the original work.  It was later shown on Masterpiece Theater.

Nevertheless, stories like these are up my alley, even if I haven’t read the original. I will confess at the ending of the entire saga, I felt upset and left hanging, so I downloaded the original work on Kindle to see if it really did end that way.  And yes, to my chagrin, it did.  Frankly, it would be a hell of a story to pick up and write a sequel . . . hum.

Soames, played by Damien Lewis (who by the way just won an Emmy for his portrayal in Homeland in 2012) is the central character of the story and family.  My heart went out to the proper, stout Englishman who adored a woman, wanted to be loved in return, and desired children. His passion, of course, borders on obsession, but you can’t help but feel sorry for the poor guy, who never found a woman to love him in life. Yes, he was a rich snob, but even snobs need love once in a while.

As far as Irene, Soames first wife and obsession, I felt absolutely no sympathy for that woman whatsoever. Perhaps my heart was a cold as the one she portrayed with little remorse over the hurt she caused others in her life. She was an interesting character who grated upon me throughout the series, which good characters are supposed to do!

As far as the remaining hours, they were an interesting treat of English life and the gorgeous dresses and costumes, dysfunctional family members, scandals, and the rest of the lot that makes up a soap opera atmosphere. No matter what English movie I watch, the birds are always chirping in the background as if life just goes merrily along.

The only problem I did have with the saga itself, were the abrupt jumps in time period, i.e. from five years, six years, and twelve, with not one gray hair eventually making it to anyone’s head! They all seemed to be ageless. A little more realism in that arena would have been better. Otherwise, it’s an enjoyable series for you English loving blokes.

White Collar (TV Show USA Network)

white-collar4 Kernels

I will admit that often I ignore some of the shows that Netflix recommends to me.  Probably for the past six months or more, I’ve consistently passed over White Collar after reading the synopsis.  It just didn’t interest me. I’m not a crime buff.

Okay, I know this is going to sound really lame, but after reading Fifty Shades of Grey and women thinking that Matt Bomer would make the perfect Christian Grey, I decided to see what all the hullabaloo was about over this good looking guy (who is gay, by the way.)  As a result, I started watching White Collar.

Instantly, I got sucked into a show that I thought I would never be interested in.  Matt Bomer plays the con-man Neal Caffrey, who cuts a deal with the FBI to shorten his prison time if they allow him to work as a consultant with the guy who put him behind bars in the first place.  Peter Burke, played by Tim DeKay, is the agent that decides to give Neal a chance.  Of course, he’s on a tight leash with a tracking device around his ankle that only gives him a two-mile radius in New York City when he’s by himself.

What can I say about this show? For someone who is NOT into crime shows, White Collar is probably the best show I’ve seen in a long time. It’s my type.  Why? The violence is very tame, there’s no cursing, the sexual situations are tempting, but there’s no graphic sex, the suspense is a killer at the end of every episode, and the characters are people that you fall in love with and become emotionally involved in their lives. Besides all of the above, the relationship between Peter Burke and Neal Caffrey is a joy to watch.  You get so attached to them both, that you sit there and worry about each of them every episode.

Frankly, after watching this show, I think I missed my calling as a writer for a  TV show. Bravo to those that pen this fantastic series. Every episode, of course, focuses upon another white collar crime and bad guy that needs catching. However, every episode is rich with undertones of the secondary story of Neal’s loves, life, secrets, and struggle to go straight. Peter’s underlying motivation is to see Neal, who he has become friends with, turn away and leave the life of crime. The questions looms, once a con man, always a con man? You should tune in to find out.

Seasons one through three are currently on Netflix.  I quickly devoured each episode.  Season four is for purchase on Amazon, which I’m watching now.  Only two left to go and then I’ll be in the desert with no Neal Caffrey, Mozzie (his side kick), Peter’s wife, and the rest of the cast.  Love them all!  White Collar was picked up for Season 5, but alas, I don’t have USA Network.  I may have to remedy that situation come January.

Anyway, as usual, I’m probably the last to stumble across this treasure of a television program.  If you are a late comer, like me, take note. You won’t be sorry.

 

The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne (Movie 1987)

Lonely5 Kernels

Stars: Maggie Smith and Bob Hoskins

Based on a book published in 1955 by Brian Moore, The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne is a classic in its own right. I watched this buried goodie on Netflix, but I’m not sure it’s still streaming. It’s on Amazon Instant Video for $3.99 and VHS at the whopping price of $79.95! It’s not available on DVD. If you like the brilliance of Maggie Smith and know the pain of being a spinster or even single, this movie is a heart-felt tearjerker. I definitely went through a few Kleenex on this one and ran for more food afterward.First off let me preface this review by saying that Maggie Smith’s performance in this movie was Oscar worthy. Maggie Smith did win the BAFTA Award for Best Actress at least. We all love Maggie for her role in Downton Abbey, but the beauty of this movie is that she is the headline star and the story revolves around Judith Hearne. Maggie does so well portraying the character that you’re frankly mesmerized by her performance as a much younger actress.

Judith is a middle-aged spinster. The setting is Dublin, Ireland. She teaches piano, and she occasionally goes on drinking binges when life becomes too hard to handle. (It’s not much different than our single binges of overeating and other destructive tendencies we partake in to kill emotional pain of loneliness.) Judith moves into another boarding house in search of a new beginning. She brings her suitcase, her framed picture of Jesus for the wall, and promises God things will be better.

Life in the boarding house is not exactly what I’d term the best place to make a new beginning. Its boarders are an eclectic mixture of nutcases from the owner to the residents. It’s here that Maggie meets the brother of the owner, who happens to be an American, played by Bob Hoskins.

James Madden, Judith’s new potential interest, isn’t the man of character that she thinks him to be. They start to spend time together, and Judith begins to falsely believe that he’s interested in her as a potential wife, when in reality all he wants is her money, of which she has very little. The realization that he’s really not interested, sends Judith spiraling downward into depression and gin bottles.

Poor Judith is a woman ridiculed and alone. She compensates for her less than happy life by telling little white lies to make her life sound better. When she finally breaks, a scene ensues where she goes to church and loses it completely. It’s the most powerful cry of the human soul I’ve seen in quite some time, as the good and faithful Catholic Judith runs to the altar, rips back curtain of the Tabernacle, and screams at God, “Are you really in there? Did you hear me?”

I think this movie moved me on a personal level because of my own life of being alone for 13 years and unanswered prayers for a mate. The climatic scene in the church is so well played by Maggie Smith and so heart wrenching, it’s hard to put into words. In any event, the movie is well worth the wonderful performance. It’s an oldie, but goodie, that deserves to be resurrected.

Memorable Lines: (Judith)”Mr. Madden, I usually go the 11 o’clock mass on Sunday. Do you have a usual time?” (Madden) “Time doesn’t matter, you just gotta get through it.”

Foyle’s War (2002 to Present)

5 Kernels
Stars: Michael Kitchen, Honeysuckle Weeks, Anthony Howell, and Julian Overden

 Type: ITV Series (22 episodes to date)

 You’ll discover a lot about who I am as a person as my reviews continue and what makes me tick. Foyle’s War, believe it or not, is a good example. I don’t always watch the “chick flick” fluff. There are times that I watch the nitty-gritty of life’s realities that are filled with struggle and often heartache.

I think my fascination with this series is due to my background. My father fought in World War II. He was in the Army Corps of Engineers, and though he was stationed in the Pacific, rather than in Europe, I know that World War II had a huge influence upon my parent’s life. My mother kissed her husband goodbye when she was pregnant with my brother, and four years later he returned, thankfully, alive. During those years, my mother worked in a radio factory, and life was tough for everyone. My parent’s generation were people that knew about sacrifice, unlike the younger generation of today, who have no idea about ration cards for food, gas masks, bombs falling upon their heads, blackouts, death, and destruction in their own backyard.

Foyle’s War is an interesting look into war in Britain from the very beginning to the end, and a few series beyond. It’s not only a murder mystery series, it’s a series about how the war affected everyone in England, from the civilian to the soldier, pilot, or sailor.

Detective Chief Superintendent Christopher Foyle (played by Michael Kitchen) is the main focus. He’s a man of honor, moral absolutes, and integrity, who is faced with not only the war in Britain, but the war against criminals during a time of war. It’s true that hardship can bring out the best in the human race, but it can also bring out the despicable of the human race. Foyle, as you soon learn in the series, is sometimes faced with the question of whether to take the high road in prosecuting the criminal, or turning a blind eye for the sake of the war effort.

From the early onset of the series, the difficulties and heartaches of war are clearly focused upon and not glossed over. The episodes are wonderfully crafted, as well as the interwoven stories of a different kind of war — one of a personal nature where individuals kill a single human not for king and country, but for personal gain, greed, and hatred.

Foyle is the ultimate man with the stiff upper lip mentality. He says very little, you can be assured, unless it’s necessary to say. The remainder of the time he ponders, deducts, and keeps a tight lip on his own emotions, though his facial expressions and body language reveal his every thought. When it’s time to reveal the killer, he pulls no punches and spews out the facts and accusations with clarity and often laced with a tad of sarcasm.

The series also focuses upon his son Andrew (handsomely played by Julian Overden, who just released an album by the way); Samantha Weeks aka Sam, who is Foyle’s driver (played by the cute Honeysuckle Weeks); and his side-kick detective Paul Milner (played by Anthony Howell). Of course, like any other series, there are side plots that involve everyone’s life.

I’m happy to see that Foyle’s War is scheduled to release three more episodes in 2013, which are after-the-war, of course. Foyle at the end of the last episode retires, but I think he has unfinished business to attend to in America.

Though this isn’t your typical female watch, if you like murder mysteries, this series could be for you. I know I absolutely loved it, and it convinces me once again that the British know how to do great television tastefully, even with difficult subjects.

Highly recommended and entertaining series. I so love British TV.

Favorite Line: (Season IV – “Invasion”) The US Army Captain says to Foyle (Paraphrased), “It’s you British that are always murdering each other.”

Greatest Disappointment: Andrew and Sam don’t get married. :sniff:

 

Angel (2007)

3 Kernels

Stars: Romola Garai, Michael Fassbender, Sam Neill

Type: Movie

This film was recommended to me by a friend, and I found it quite interesting. Set in the Edwardian era in Cheshire, England, it’s a story about a young woman, who dreams of being an author. She comes from a poor background and is the daughter of a widowed grocery shopkeeper. As soon as you meet Angel, you will quickly pick up on her narcissistic tendencies.

Angel wants to be a writer, and is convinced she’s brilliant even before her first book is picked up by a publisher. :inserts laughter here: She writes romance novels, filled with her own fantasies. Of course, she’s an overnight success, which feeds into her need for attention, and Angel quickly learns to bask in the limelight.

Angel writes not only for success, but she writes to rewrite her own painful life by creating a world of her own imagination. As an author having had times of building my own make-believe worlds to shut out the pain of reality, I totally understood the driving force behind Angel Deverell’s need to rewrite her life in order to survive it. Creativity sometimes borders on a type of madness, and I think there has always been some stigma that the greatest of geniuses in any art form are a bit eccentric and unbalanced.

You soon learn, as the movie progresses, that Angel possesses deep emotional problems. She falls in love with the idea of loving a man that she has fantasized about, but when the fantasy becomes reality, it’s her undoing in the end.

Though the beginning is filled with what I call “fluff” of Angel’s rise in popularity as a writer, the unhappiness that eventually catches up to her isn’t a surprise. She loved her husband like the characters in her books loved their heros – blindly and with a tad of selfish and obsessive possessiveness. In addition, the home she dreamed of owning as a child called Paradise, becomes a reality when she makes enough money to purchase the estate. However, she soon learns that Paradise isn’t everything she had hoped for, and her home becomes her personal purgatory instead.

The costumes and indoor settings are stunning, but the cinematography is awful, which distracts from the story and cheapens the film. It’s too bad, frankly, because a bigger budget might have made this film a little more memorable. Fake backgrounds abound, and they are terrible. Romola Garai does a fine job portraying Angel, and I can’t complain about her performance.

All in all, I enjoyed it and would recommend it to my author friends. It’s the tragic drama of an interesting character’s life. Worth the watch if you’re into that sort of storyline.

Below is a trailer, however, it’s not the best of quality.

Bel Ami (2012)

2 Kernels

Stars: Robert Pattinson, Uma Thurman, Kristin Scott Thomas, Christina Ricci

Type: Movie

 

Bel Ami is a fairly new film I recently watched on Amazon Instant Video. It apparently had a very limited release at the same time in June of 2012, and is schedule to go straight to DVD this August. The movie is pretty much a “Rotten Tomato” on a lot of review sites, and frankly I have to concur. It’s based on the 1885 French novel of the same name by Guy de Maupassant, which I have not read.

There are movies that can be visually stimulating, filled with stunning costumes, big-named stars, and yet sorely lack the basic elements to make it memorable. I think Bel Ami suffers two-fold, in that (1) Robert Pattinson doesn’t carry the central character’s role well enough to make it a noteworthy performance, and (2) the story revolves around a very unlikeable character. The two combined makes it a lethal combination. Perhaps if Duroy would have been cast with a different actor, it may have saved the film. I’m sorry to be so harsh on the heart throb Pattinson, but he just didn’t fit the character’s role other than physical looks.

On the other hand, let’s face it, Duroy is not a character you really fall in love with anyway, if you know anything about the story. Oh, yes, he’s attractive, sexy, dreamy-eyed, able to seduce women with a single sly grin and embodies everything you want in bed from a tender lover to a rough aggressive bad boy–take your pick. He has the stamina of a deer in rut bedding two different women in a matter of mere hours.

You learn the following about his character, besides his inability to keep his manhood in check, that he grew up poor, isn’t very bright, and isn’t respected by other men. You quickly learn that he doesn’t possess much of a conscious or a heart, and uses the lives of others for his own gain. Hence the term “scoundrel” or Bel Ami.

The one thing that struck me about the story is that your not privy to the inward thoughts of Duroy or his motivations. You watch his dark brooding, drunken binges, his narrowing gaze, and outbursts of anger and make your own conclusion as to what makes him tick as a man. Besides being a morally loose rake, with no conscience bedding three women at once, he comes across as a relatively ignorant and despised man in his social circle.

Finally, at the end of the movie, you are suddenly given a glimpse into the deep musings and inward workings of his dark heart. It’s here that he reveals it’s not enough to be loved. He doesn’t want to scrape through life, like his father in poverty, while praying for a better life in the next world. There is no next world. We rot in the grave. Better to grab it in the here and now rather than to hope for something that will never come. Of course, as a scoundrel, that’s the only way he knows how to gain what he wants in life. His final conquest is to marry a woman he doesn’t love (and I seriously doubt the man has the capacity to love), so he can live rich at the hand of her father’s money, who he despises. I probably should take lessons from this sod on how to create a despicable male characters in my next book (though some think I did well with the last one).

Well, like millions of Parisians of that day, he probably would have contracted syphilis anyway and died an early death never able to enjoy his gain. Wealth he would have obtained, but respect and status would never arrive, which frankly are the riches the man really wants but doesn’t realize.

The three ladies he beds are all characters of their own sort. His first wife uses him, as he uses her, and is an adulterer from the very beginning (played brilliantly by Uma Thurman). The second woman (played by Christina Ricci), married as well, loves Duroy in spite of the ass that he is and continues to do so after he marries again for money. The older woman (played by Kristin Scott Thomas), who falls for his charms and is married to his nemesis, he seduces just to sully what the man owns. He doesn’t give a damn about her, and discards her like trash when the deed is done by marrying her daughter instead.

In any event, the movie is a mixed bag because of the story and unlovable character you really don’t want to romp in the sack with at all. Of course, you may just want to watch the movie for eye candy sake, but for mentality sake, there won’t be much else to feed the brain cells.

Shakespeare in Love (1998)

4 Kernels

Stars: Gwyneth Paltrow, Joseph Fiennes, John Madden, Geoffrey Rush, and Ben Affleck

It’s been some time since I’ve watched this movie. I saw it when it originally came out, pretty much went on with life, and recently watched it again. Twelve years ago, I don’t think it impressed me as much as it did the last time I clicked play. It’s obvious that my life’s experiences over the years have changed my view of the movie. Does that ever happen to you?

In spite of the recent controversy stirred by the movie Anonymous over who really wrote the works of Shakespeare, one cannot help but honor the writer of the wonderful words he penned. I do know everyone screamed “foul” when Shakespeare in Love won the Oscar for best picture beating out Private Ryan. Perhaps the voters were in the mood for love, rather than entrails, blood, and gore. If you look at the reviews, you’ll see it’s really one of those love/hate relationships with viewers.

Frankly, I think there is a hidden brilliance behind this movie. It’s about the author who writes a love tragedy, while he lives out his own tragedy with the woman he loves. The affair between William and Viola ensues, and when it does, the well of inspiration Shakespeare thought had gone dry, suddenly springs forth renewed. Their scandalous affair leads to the penning of Romeo and Juliet.

As the story evolves, so does the tragic truth that they will never be together. He is bound by a previous marriage and lives a life of a lowly playwright and poet, while the woman he loves is bound by the Queen’s command and her father to wed another. The stage is set for a love affair that ends in loss and separation. When he realizes how their end will play out, he writes the tragic conclusion to the infamous play. Romeo is a man who cannot live without the woman he loves, much how William feels over his current situation.

When William’s debut of Romeo and Juliet is performed for the first time, by strange circumstances they play the roles — Will as Romeo and Viola as Juliet. Of course, in that day, women couldn’t be on stage, but Viola all along has violated that rule due to her desire to act. Their hearts are torn playing their parts, as they both know their lives will be torn asunder as soon as the play ends. She married that very day. Each are forced to follow another path — two star-crossed lovers unable to have one another. Alas, it was not meant to be.

As far as the stars, I wasn’t enthralled seeing Colin Firth act like a sod. Judy Dench was fine, as usual, in a short role of Queen Elizabeth I. She won the Oscar for best supporting role.

Gwyneth Paltrow and Geoffrey Rush were their usual on film. Gwyneth, for me at least, always seems the same on film, no matter what the role. Nevertheless, she walked away with an Oscar for best actress that year. Cate Blanchett was nominated for her role in Elizabeth, which I thought was far more deserving. :tosses in my two cents:

Joseph Fiennes as William Shakespeare makes for good eye candy. He plays well the role of the tortured writer, searching for his muse, passionate about life and storytelling. Fiennes’ eyes are very expressive. :tosses in another two cents:

Favorite Lines: (Hugh Fennyman) Who’s that? (Philip Henslowe) Nobody. He’s the author.

(Isn’t that the truth! LOL)

Bramwell (1995-1998)

4 Kernels
The Victorian Way of Life

Stars: Jemma Redgrave and David Calder

Type: British ITV Four Seasons (28 episodes)

Let’s get something out of the way. I love British TV. Seventy percent of what I’ll review has been filmed by the English. It fascinates me. They are great storytellers. Drama is their forte, as well as comedy–hands down.

Twenty-eight episodes later, you’ll be well educated in the Victorian way of life if you tune into Bramwell. I watched it originally on Netflix, but as you know stories come and go there. However, the DVD’s are available on Amazon.

The series is named after its main character, Dr. Eleanor Bramwell, a woman physician in 1895. Her father is a doctor, as well, and his daughter has decided to follow in her father’s footsteps. However, in 1895, women physicians struggled to be taken seriously by their male peers in the same profession. The series begins in a hospital, where after a heated argument with physician in charge, Eleanor embarks on opening a thrift medical center to treat the poor with the help of a financial supporter. Her father is appalled over the idea.

It’s here in this setting that the series embarks upon a variety of stories revolving around her patients and staff, interspersed with her home and social life in an upper-class environment. The medical cases are crude, such as treating women thought to be too hysterical by removing their ovaries to “calm them down,” to the early methods of surgery without the wearing of masks and sterile conditions. It’s a wonder anyone lived, frankly, through half the medical procedures. Nevertheless, it’s a time of learning and knowledge for the medical profession, even if they are still in the dark ages about some practices.


Overall the series is wonderful portrayal of Victorian life, manners, courtship, class differences, evolution of medical knowledge, and a woman’s place in society. Eleanor Bramwell is a feisty woman, who at times I wish I could knock up side the head. Her character is stubborn, independent, and bull-headed. However, she was born in a time when women were spreading their wings and demanding better treatment. Eleanor, however, is so opinionated in her vie for change, that she thinks she is always right – about everything. On the other hand, her treatment of the poor and attitude toward the sick is her redeeming quality.

Every other character that came and went throughout seasons one through three, were great additions to the story. Eleanor is unmarried, but has a main love interest in her life, another doctor. The man is frankly a scoundrel, as far as I am concerned. Even in all of her self-professed intelligence, Eleanor didn’t have an ounce of sense when it came to men.

Seasons one through three are wonderful. Season four falls flat on its face. Many of the main characters are gone, including her father. My suggestion is skip four, and save yourself the pain. It sorely lacks the brilliance of the first three. Read a synopsis instead to satisfy your curiosity.

If you like the Victorian Era, this is the series for you.

A Dangerous Method (2011)

7489a-dangerous2bmethod1 Kernel

Stars: Keira Knightley, Viggo Mortensen, Michael Fassbender

R Rated Review

Okay, the disclaimer is up. It’s a shocking movie. If you’re a psychologist buff who has studied the works of Jung and Freud, this movie could be your cup of tea. If you’re an individual who has been beaten and sexually abused, hide the play button. It could resurrect repressed memories you had hoped to forget. Watch at your own risk. On the other hand, if you read Fifty Shades of Grey and liked it, this movie could be right up your alley.

This movie is supposedly based on a true story. Enters Sabina Spielrein – painfully played by Keira Knightly, I might add. She arrives at the mental institution, Carl Jung (played by Michael Fassbender) is her doctor. He sits in a chair behind her and starts to embark on the method of psychoanalyzing a disturbed woman. Sabina contorts into all sorts of physical language from her face to her toes, and confesses to her doctor that she’s been abused, beaten, and likes it. In today’s language that would be translated into kinky sex. She enjoys being naked, tied up, and beaten as a result of what her father did to her as a child.

As her treatment progresses, Carl meets his idol, Sigmond, and they discuss her case. However, Sabina, as she becomes more stable, entices her doctor into a relationship. Married and about to commit professional suicide, Jung has an affair with her anyway. If that isn’t bad enough, he satisfies her sexual needs by binding her and beating her with a belt. The act portrayed on screen is far too long on screen, as you watch her contort in pain but enjoy it sexually. The man who is suppose to cure her ends up reinforcing her behavior instead. The outcome is disastrous.

Jung becomes as addicted to her and their affair (even though at one point he tries to break it off), as she is addicted to her behavior. He gives you the impression he loves the dominant male position of spanking her bottom with his belt as much as she loves it at the receiving end. Whether Jung really did go that far in real life is questionable, since he’s well known and revered in his work. From what I’ve read the affair was real, but I’d like to believe the remainder is Hollywood contrived.

The interaction and professional discussions between Jung and Freud are interesting to watch. Surprisingly, Sabina eventually goes on in life to become a psychiatrist herself. Jung helps her achieve that goal. The affair eventually ends, the two part, she marries and finds her own successful career, while Jung wallows in regrets.

Frankly, I had high hopes for this movie, but it turned out rather discouraging and convoluted to watch. The timeline jumps from one period to the next. Scenes happen that make no sense and are followed with no explanation. For example Freud suffers what appears to be a heart attack or stroke in one scene, the next he’s perfectly fine. Huh? The acting on Kiera’s part can only be described as painful to watch earlier in the movie, and bland by others.

Not my cup of tea, especially standing in their bedroom watching drawn out scenes of Sabina tied to the bed and beaten with a belt for sexual arousal. I didn’t count the number of times; I only remember saying to myself, “Enough already, I get the point.”

Refund please.

%d bloggers like this: